Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lilune"
From Immwiki
(liloonie tunes) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Probably less likely among crafters, but those who turn out particularly marvellous pieces of work... | Probably less likely among crafters, but those who turn out particularly marvellous pieces of work... | ||
| + | Would Lilune be a good place for more intense, short-term relationships? I could see some interesting possibilities for a character who seeks Lilune's favor, finds it, gets used-up, then spends the rest of his life trying to match his earlier, inspired achievements, but is now a husk of his former self. Sort of like Dwarf Fortress's Moods, but replacing the future legendary ability with practically bipolar mood swings. | ||
| − | + | :I would prefer to avoid artists specifically because that is more Aeolis and Serachel's purview, and Serachel in particular is in a place where that sort of overlap cannot afford to exist. The rest is pretty much exactly as-intended, yeah, though. (and you can sign talk pages with four tildes, like so) [[User:Neongrey|Neongrey]] 03:00, 5 May 2011 (UTC) | |
| − | + | ||
Latest revision as of 03:00, 5 May 2011
Brazen: The Marquis de Sade would love Lilune.
Should artists be added into the follower archetypes? Is there a better word for a particularly frenzied artist? Probably less likely among crafters, but those who turn out particularly marvellous pieces of work...
Would Lilune be a good place for more intense, short-term relationships? I could see some interesting possibilities for a character who seeks Lilune's favor, finds it, gets used-up, then spends the rest of his life trying to match his earlier, inspired achievements, but is now a husk of his former self. Sort of like Dwarf Fortress's Moods, but replacing the future legendary ability with practically bipolar mood swings.
- I would prefer to avoid artists specifically because that is more Aeolis and Serachel's purview, and Serachel in particular is in a place where that sort of overlap cannot afford to exist. The rest is pretty much exactly as-intended, yeah, though. (and you can sign talk pages with four tildes, like so) Neongrey 03:00, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
